personal

Hate and Evil in the Universe

Martin Luther King, Jr., speaking to his congregation in Montgomery, Alabama said:

I think the first reason that we should love our enemies…is this: that hate for hate only intensifies the existence of hate and evil in the universe. If I hit you and you hit me and I hit you back and you hit me back and go on, you see, that goes on ad infinitum. It just never ends. Somewhere somebody must have a little sense, and that’s the strong person. The strong person is the person who can cut off the chain of hate, the chain of evil… Somebody must have religion enough and morality enough to cut it off, and inject within the very structure of the universe that strong and powerful element of love. — “Loving Your Enemies” 17 November 1957

Lost in the Observational Cosmology Lab

Watch me give a talk on cosmology! Video and slides are available using a flash or windows media presentation or mp3+PDF: Lost In The Observational Cosmology Lab. The talk was the inaugural lecture of Perimeter Institute‘s Young Researchers Symposium. I spoke to some grad students + 1 postdoc + 1 visiting Harvard professor/friend of mine about cosmology and some of the research I will be doing as part of my postdoctoral fellowship starting this fall.

While you’re checking out my talk, you can also look around at Perimeter’s publicly available talk archive, which has almost every talk that is given in the building!

White Self Indulgence

Paul and I agreed that my latest post on IGT would be an interesting contribution, although there was some equivocation about whether people would respond to it maturely. Well, let’s see! Check out my article White Self Indulgence which is a meditation on music, race and fandom:

I often need to rev myself up with defiant words. I like this particular version of it because the music, the words and the delivery are furious, and lurking underneath it all, I’ve got a competitive fury. Deep, I know. The problem is that Mindless Self Indulgence (MSI), the band that performs the song “Shut Me Up,” also really, really likes to throw the word “nigga” around in their lyrics. Well, the problem is that I’m not quite sure this is a problem.

How a Heart Can Break

So tonight, I’m gonna find a way to make it without you. Have you ever tried sleeping with a broken heart?
What you did to me was a crime. Cold case love . . . Your love was breaking the law, but I needed a witness.

The first line is from Alicia Keys’s “Sleeping with a Broken Heart” and the second Rihanna’s “Cold Case Love” (notably co-written with King Timberlake himself). These lines stick with me as I round out the end of February (and at this very moment, avoid doing the dishes). Why? Because they are so conclusive and so pained, and that’s kind of how things feel right now. In a few months I will be wrapping up my doctorate, and I now know, at least for now, my time in Canada. I’m going to be starting a NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellowship at Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, MD in September, a position I chose instead of one in Trieste, Italy after incredibly difficult deliberation.

In exchange for the effort I was rewarded by a rather nasty email from a member of my family that included lines like this:

Then of course you will be with people who are there for the money, with no consideration for the social implications of the identity they are undertaking. Is this really what you want to do? The latest US imperial move (aside from the wr in Afghanistan) is to begin to occupy Haiti, depriving it of the one remaining legacy of the revolution: its independence. Is that what you want to stand for? . . . Among many other influences, your boss and also your colleagues will expect your compliance, and you will soon expect that of yourself if you are not to ‘fail’.

I wrote a rather lengthy response at the insistence of my biological parents, who both felt that if I was going to do something productive with my fury, I should channel it into a clarification of what kind of person I am and what I stand for. I won’t get into the details of that because they don’t matter for what I want to say here. And I know that what I wrote wasn’t enough because I still can’t climb out from underneath the weight of an email that accuses me of being a follower, right to pulling the switch in the gas chamber. What I do want to say is that it will be a while before I can experience a sense of pride in what I have achieved, as a scientist who is a person of conscience, as a person who has always known that conscience must take precedence before science, and who hoped to encourage others to see it the same way.

This isn’t the first time in the last year or so that my integrity has been called into question. That seems to have been the theme of my life, whether it’s because of my professional decisions or my personal ones. I’ve been very lucky that along the way people insisted on retaining faith in me. Notably my mother. Narinda, who flew thousands of miles to get me through my qualifying exam. Ryan who began as a confidant who was also experiencing lost love and became an incredible best friend. The lovely Cantabrigians (02138) who hosted me, spent time with me and listened to me, repeatedly. Others here in Waterloo who made me welcome in their social circles, their homes and in one case, their church.

Last night, thinking over the email from my family member merged into thinking about the collapse of my marriage that slowly crept up and then seemed like a sudden explosion. However people may view the many mistakes and missteps I made, the unfair things I said and did, I am able to recall that underneath it, I was trying, at each step, to do right. Much like I try to do with my work. And I’ve learned that it’s not easy to figure out what those things are, and that people will try very hard to hurt you or leave you to suffer if they can’t understand your choices or trust your goals. I know my partner in that collapse, my ex-wife, has her own remorse to deal with, her own mistakes, her own version of pain. I know I have faith in her redeeming qualities, despite that, and I am glad that I do.

It’s heartbreaking to have the people closest to you accuse you of being willing to become complicit in murder. It’s also heartbreaking to make irreparable mistakes that injure others and live with others’ irreparable mistakes. These things are tangled in my mind, perhaps because in the end, like T.S. Eliot said, “What might have been and what has been/ Point to one end, which is always present.” Present and compassion. Present compassion. The question is are you a compassionate person? Well, for very few of us there is a constant answer to this question. More often it is complex, wavering with the ebb and tide of our ability to cope, our sensibilities and values. So the question that we must ask almost constantly is: am I a compassionate person in this moment?

And I would be lying, and so would most people, if I said yes every single time. But I know I’m trying. I was then. I am now.

I should be celebrating. But I can’t celebrate in the midst of the enormity of the perceived and actual failures of my character that have been thrown at me. I want the best for the people around me and even the people not immediately around me. Sometimes I go too far in my thinking about how to bring this about; more often than not, I get lost trying to balance the equation of fairness, equity and justice. But to think my goal is anything else . . . the fact of this thought, it weighs on heavily on me. And to think that in my confusion I would cross the line into assisting mass murder for the sake of my career? Well, that’s just as insane as the ideas that drive genocide itself.

Hopefully people can remember that I too want to be able look myself in the mirror in 20 years.

healthcare

Congress: Get Your @!#@!$# Together on Health Care

Thursday 4 February 2010

Dear Congress,

As an American who has been living abroad and who was excited about coming home to visit, I have a simple question: What kind of fuckery is this? It turned out that today I needed some medical assistance, and getting it was almost more painful than the actual physical problem. And, I even have health insurance. But it didn’t matter. For most doctors it wasn’t the right health insurance.

So, Congress, I just want to know. WHAT THE FUCK? And I realize that I am using informal language and CAPS to make points, and I apologize for how this might seem unprofessional, less than decorous and less than serious. But the truth is, I am moved to this behavior because of the dead, and I do mean dead, seriousness of the issue of health care in America. I cannot understand how you can say you stand for Americans when Americans die and suffer unnecessarily, all the time, every single day, because of a system you refuse to genuinely challenge.

I know, I know. What if it leads us down the path to socialism? We all know that word is BAD! But you know what’s worse? Children losing their homes and their parents to cancer, unnecessarily. If guaranteeing everyone that we will make an effort to heal their body is socialist, I say BRING IT ON. I cannot imagine, really cannot imagine, that you want to sacrifice these good, hard-working mothers, fathers, teachers, manual laborers, sisters, brothers, aunts, uncles, you-name-its, in the name of protecting Capitalism. Yet, that is what is happening.

Some of you will say that there are principles here that go beyond arguments about economic structures. You will ask, “What about the fetuses?” Have a care for the unborn children, right? Okay, even though I think your desire to make choices for my body is gross, I’m willing to allow this reaction. What I’m not willing to do is accept the next logical step that you take, which is to punish the ALREADY BORN children as part of your mandate to protect the not-quite-in-existence-yet ones. Because there are actual real, live children out there who are waiting for you to pass health care reform so that they can have coverage. They are waiting for their parents to get coverage. Let me tell you, it’s no fun to watch a parent be horribly ill as a child. It’s even worse when they aren’t getting help. I’ve been there, and that experience is just wrong.

So stop demanding the hostage exchange. Stop holding up health care until the other side agrees to hold up women’s rights. I acquiesce to your right to fight on to end abortion rights, even if I hope you lose every single time. But not like this. You are killing people in your quest, and isn’t that antithetical to what you stand for? Or are unborn fetuses the only ones who deserve to live in your book? I don’t want to think that you all are a pack of unfeeling, inhumane assholes, but I’ll do it if you are going to insist on this kind of behavior.

Congress, I wish I could say that this whole letter is about people without health insurance. But it’s not. Millions of Americans can afford health insurance and still get screwed. Some of them pay for it only to discover the insurance company refuses to cover treatments that are urgently needed. Others get booted after surviving a life-threatening condition. (Indeed, for all of our pink breast cancer fundraising, I’m starting to wonder whether insurance companies are more responsible for deaths than the actual thing.) Others can’t get health insurance because they have a pre-existing “condition.” It still boggles my mind that one can qualify for discrimination by surviving. Surviving. THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY PUNISHES PEOPLE FOR SURVIVING ONE OF LIFE’S MOST INCREDIBLE STRUGGLES.

Wow, are we a country of fucking assholes or what? Not only are people excluded because they fought to live and succeeded, but even when they have health insurance, a complex system of incentives has lead doctors to only take patients who have coverage from the “right” companies. In other words, corporate priorities have subsumed patient choice and patient needs. Need to find a doctor? Good luck! The best guy is only covered by insurance plan A, and you have insurance plan Z. Sorry, but you don’t actually deserve the best care.

I remember David Cross saying something along the lines of “Are we a nation of 8 year olds?” in one of his routines. I thought it was funny, but now I kind of wish we were. Even though 8 year olds can be mean, they also seem to be fundamentally capable of being concerned for others. This is more than I can say for whatever vibes Congress is putting out right now. What I’m getting from Congress is fear of change, fear of words, fear of pissing off corporate sponsors. What I’m getting from Congress is fear of behaving decently. I don’t care if it’s hard. It can’t possibly be harder than watching people die unnecessarily.

But that’s what is happening. And I don’t understand it, at the end of the day. Hence my question: What kind of fuckery is this? I don’t really know how to answer it, and to be honest, Congress, I don’t think you do either. So my recommendation is that you get up off your collective ass and fix it. Now. Prove that you actually are members of the human race. Show a little compassion. Show that you can recognize that the system, if it is not serving the people, has no purpose.

Thanks for doing the right thing,
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein

Pasadena

My latest public piece of writing is an essay on Pasadena at Is Greater Than:

During those trips, I dreamed of Pasadena and its sprawling lawns. I dreamed of a car with fancy automated locks and windows that had ventilation in the back. I dreamed of living far enough from the freeway that I couldn’t hear it at all hours. I dreamed of bookstores and buying the occasional novel. I dreamed of the brown and cream colored buildings that said, “We are Californian, just like you.”

Is Greater Than – Pasadena.

brainyblackbitches.com

All together now, let’s breath a sigh of relief that such a website does not exist. At least not as far as Google can tell me. A search for the words “brainy black bitches” pulls up the website, “MY BLACK SLUTS,” a pornography site with its own set of linguistic problems that I won’t get into.

So, why bring up a website that does not exist? Because this weekend, some of my activist friends excitedly thought that I had found it and/or brought it into existence. Yes, some of my activist (read: leftist/revolutionary) friends excitedly clicked on a link in my google talk status, hoping to find an actual “brainyblackbitches.com.” They then messaged me to tell me how disappointing it was that the website wasn’t real! Indeed, not one person seemed to breath a sigh of relief.

The first time it happened, I didn’t think much of it because I was still in a state of mind guided by how it came to be my status in the first place. In the course of thinking about the need for women of color to network online, I proposed to my white boyfriend that I start a website to serve the community. Since he’s a funny guy, I asked him for suggestions of smart titles.

His first suggestion was “brainyblackbitches.com,” which we giggled over. Why? Because it is the stupidest possible name. Because it was so ridiculous that we had to laugh. Because the idea that an anti-racist activist like me would produce such a site is, well, laughable. Ryan actually put it pretty well himself when he messaged me, “Here’s an idea for what not to call a website for women of colour in science. Also, I like alliteration.”

What’s not funny is that people are disappointed that I hadn’t, or that someone hadn’t made such a site. As complaints rolled in, I started to wonder — does the left know the difference between itself and the KKK? Deep down of course (I hope) the answer is yes. But I’ve started to wonder whether the artists walking around saying they should be able to do blackface and say “nigger” and all of this other crap are actually getting their cues from the left, and not in fact from the KKK-like right extremists that so many are quick to blame.

Where exactly would they be getting these hints? Well, there’s this fascinating movement working toward “taking ownership of the language.” So, nigger is good when a lefty uses it, and bad when a righty uses it. Somehow, this disempowers the language because now everyone is using it and sometimes it is offensive but sometimes it is disempowering the offensiveness. All of this is determined by the fact that people on the left are obviously trustworthy, unlike those evil people on the right. By the same logic Bitch Magazine, apparently “Provides commentary on our media-driven world from a feminist perspective” (thus ensuring that I have yet another reason to feel uncomfortable calling myself a feminist).

The truth is that some words have lost their power. I have no problem using “queer.” That probably has something to do with the fact that “queer” is as bad as “gay” to the homophobes. There really is no good word. The words are used equally as slurs and positive self-identifications. Additionally, people have more and more realized that there is nothing wrong with being strange, that is queer. That is far from the case for the word “bitch” or the word “nigger” or even the word “colored.” It’s worth noting that none of the people who were excited were Black, and I’m pretty sure my Black friends would have been furious if they thought I had anything to do with such a site.

Adrienne Rich once called English “the oppressor’s language,” and I get that people are desperate to make it their own. But getting tied up in trying to take back the language, I think, is a quick way to:
a. Confuse potential allies
b. Give cover to potential anti-allies
c. Provide a theoretical distraction from what my friend Narinda calls “the racism truck hurtling at us.”

So let’s not get confused. Just because ANGRYBLACKBITCH is “practicing the fine art of bitchitude” over at Blogger doesn’t mean everyone who is interested in social justice is interested in using these words to describe themselves. I may agree with ABB about a lot of things, but I’m perfectly satisfied to be a woman, and to struggle for recognition as one (even in the world of science, where, well, the facts should be obvious). Indeed, having Sojourner as one of my middle names has always given me a sense of ownership over the question that Ms. Truth once asked, “Ain’t I a woman?

I don’t need to be a bitch to be recognized as an equal. I’m a brainy Black woman, thanks.

Yes, white women are doing well

Recently, it was proudly announced, “GOOD NEWS! Women are doing well in astronomy!” But,if you look at the data, that fantastic news is really only for white women. And as Sojourner Truth said, ain’t I a woman? Below I give an example of what I mean. Something I am leaving out of the discussion — because it deserves its very own space — is the way these numbers hide the challenges that Asian women in particular face.

So, just how many American women have earned degrees in physics and astronomy since the NSF started keeping track in 1973? Using NSF’s WebCASPAR database, I’ve produced a couple of tables for you to eyeball. As you can see, white women have seen extraordinary growth by an order of magnitude, as have Asian women. Unfortunately, women from traditionally underrepresented groups (Black, Hispanic [which includes Latinos/Chicanos/Puertorriqueños etc.], Native American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders) have not faired so well.

Here are two tables. The first one is for women in physics, and the second is for women in astronomy. A few things that are worth noting:
1. Women make up a larger percentage of the population in astronomy, so this data should be disturbing. Although astronomy is more accepting of white women, it does not seem to be a safe space for women of color, especially Blacks and Hispanics.
2. There has been no notable progress for Indigenous Americans.

I don’t have time to do a statistical analysis here, but if you get curious about the data, I invite you to plow through it yourselves. EDIT: You can check out women in physics and women in astronomy. I used to have the tables posted here, but they were very hard to read in this blog theme.

Must Read: On Rape and Men (Brace Yourself)

If you’re a man reading this, this is what you have to do: you have to make your male friends uncomfortable. You have to bring up this subject out of the blue and tell them everything I just told you. You should especially quiz them on some of the recommendations on the rape prevention list. I don’t give a shit if they look at you funny for it, especially if you believe them to truly be your friends.Addressing and preventing rape requires the audacity of reason, with an emphasis on “audacity.”And if you encounter a man who consistently refuses to accept some of the arguments outlined in this diary, you should be watching him closely from now on.

Daily Kos: On Rape and Men (Brace Yourself).

On the Difficulty of “Saying No” – The Sexist – Washington City Paper

The “no means no” mantra that Holmquist is railing against is itself pretty old-school. “No means no” operates on the outdated assumption that men are the “scorers,” women are the “gatekeepers,” and the goal of every sexual encounter is for men to sneak past a woman’s line of defense and get her to not say no. In this model, the default setting of women’s bodies is “available.” Only by verbalizing a “no” can a woman signal that her body is not up for grabs. In recent years, that bullshit has been replaced by more progressive models which focus on raising the consent bar from “absence of no” to “enthusiastic yes.”

On the Difficulty of “Saying No” – The Sexist – Washington City Paper.